Deterrence
Successfully deterring individuals from engaging in behaviour that poses security threats demands a deep understanding of what motivates harmful actions. By examining the social and psychological drivers behind these risks, we can develop more effective strategies to prevent them.
In this issue of CREST Security Review, we explore how cutting-edge research is transforming deterrence, from mitigating insider threats to combating cybercrime.
We begin with Shaw who provides an overview of recent developments of the Critical Pathway to Insider Risk™. Staying on the topic of insider risk, Martin attempts to distil the complex issues into a set of ten simple principles.
Next, Nurse proposes an effective ransomware deterrence strategy which could re-define cyber deterrence more widely.
Marchment explores the existing evidence base on crime displacement and benefit diffusion. Squires’ research begins to explain the differences in the types of crimes men and women are prosecuted for, the sentencing differences, and the implications.
Meanwhile, McIlhatton’s research project responds to the challenge of understanding how best to evaluate protective security measures in an increasingly complex threat environment.
Grubin sparks a debate on whether polygraph testing in a police environment should be put to wider use.
Bystanders are often key to preventing acts of mass violence. However, as Cilke and Rowe discuss, education and awareness for security professionals and authorities in bystander reporting is needed to understand the barriers they face.
Additionally, Thomas and Grossman share their upcoming international policy-focussed research study on community reporting thresholds.
Finally, Benson explains that a multi-pronged strategy is needed to deter and prevent illicit finance.
Additionally, we feature articles addressing broader aspects of security research. Czerwinsky examines the entry pathways into misogynist ‘inceldom’ and subsequent considerations for practitioners. While Luther, Eastwood, and Snook discuss the effectiveness of using sketching as an interview tool.
For further exploration, refer to the ‘Read More’ section for research underpinning our articles and additional reading. We value your feedback on this issue and welcome your suggestions for future topics. Please share your thoughts via the provided survey link.
Thank you.
Rebecca Stevens & Kayleigh Brennan
Editors, CSR.
